Amputee accuses doctors of clinical negligence
Published 01/07/2008
A young woman who had her leg amputated as a result of bone cancer is suing doctors over alleged clinical negligence, it has been revealed.
Sally Hurst claims that her limb may have been saved had medics identified her condition sooner.
The 29-year-old was only diagnosed with osteosarcoma - a cancer which can develop in any bone but which is most common in arms and legs - six months after she first went to her GP complaining of pain in her leg.
In September 2004, Ms Hurst was told by a doctor that the discomfort was caused by ligament damage.
Meanwhile, later that year, she claims that another GP prescribed her anti-inflammatory drugs but did not refer her to a specialist.
In 2005, she was sent to a physiotherapist, who ordered tests which revealed she was suffering from cancer.
By this stage, it was too late to perform limb-saving surgery on the tumour and, after it did not respond to chemotherapy, Ms Hurst required an amputation.
Related articles
- Teen could win millions in alleged clinical negligence case - 29 Aug 2008
- Cerebral palsy sufferer wins right to pursue clinical negligence claim - 22 Aug 2008
- Mother of cancer victim secures £160k payout - 20 Aug 2008
- Parents of cerebral palsy sufferer claim clinical negligence - 18 Aug 2008
- NHS trust accused of clinical negligence issues apology - 06 Aug 2008
