E-mail this to a friend
Print this
The Apprentice Analysed
The Lawyer Online
13 June 2008
Suralan has finally hired his apprentice, and Lee “that’s what I’m talking about” McQueen was probably the best of bad bunch – I wonder if the famed “reverse pterodactyl” is now extinct?!
I was surprised that Alex and Helene laboured over the name of their perfume with so many obvious possibilities.
I am sure most men would love to wear “Gobsh*te” or even “24” – the fragrance of a young high achiever - but my choice would have been “Balls”, which, as all Apprentice fans know, would have the added advantage of being unisex.
Would any metrosexual offended at being labelled a “has been” by roulette player Ryan have a claim under the sexual orientation or age regulations? If so, could they name Ryan as an actual comparator?!
In view of CV-gate, will Suralan be taking up Lee’s references?
In light of Alex's taxi claim that he hasn't slept or eaten for 12 weeks, surely Article 3 ECHR (no one shall be subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment) is breached.
Incidentally, does anyone know how old Alex is?